Saturday, February 02, 2013
The Big Picture For The Week of February 3, 2013
A couple of different articles that I think can relate into the same topic.
First is an article at the WSJ titled Americans Rip Up Retirement Plans. This really is about people working longer or planning to work longer mostly because of generally poor investment results and to a lesser extent due to life expectancy going up.
This is something I've been writing about for many years as the need has seemed obvious for many years. Although I don't think I have used this word before, the idea of working longer or monetizing a hobby or any other (hopefully) outside the box idea we've discussed, is adaptability. Part of the equation is the ability to adapt--something's gotta give.
Maybe you have enough to retire the way you want to at 65 but then two years later some sort of financial one-off comes along that costs 10% of your nest egg. And maybe this occurs after the market just went down 15% and the 10% cost is not versus your nest egg but instead versus your highwater mark from before the 15% decline.
So it is with this in mind, even if not specifically articulated, that I write so frequently about living below your means, finding alternative forms of income and avoiding a plan that must have Social Security to have a shot at working; all of these things make it easier to adapt to the unforeseen. There is no guarantee of adaptability only a better chance for it if needed.
The other article looked to build upon work done many years ago by Viktor Frankl by discerning between being happy in life and finding a purpose to your life. As you can imagine there are areas of overlap but there are some differences too, so says the article. One stat that stuck out was that four out of ten Americans "have not discovered a satisfying life purpose."
The article associated the word taker with being happy and giver with having purpose and steered its conclusion toward it being better to be a giver with purpose. While the article did acknowledge overlap between the two I think they overlap more than the article concluded or at least they can depending on a person's interests and outlook.
Zooming out some the quote from our friend Bill here in Walker is relevant; you can figure it out now or you can figure it out later but if you can figure it now you'll be much better off.
While I don't know how the four out of ten number cited above could have a large enough sample size, this is part of figuring it out. Of course financial-plan success can be had without adaptability and self-awareness but you won't know until you need it.
First is an article at the WSJ titled Americans Rip Up Retirement Plans. This really is about people working longer or planning to work longer mostly because of generally poor investment results and to a lesser extent due to life expectancy going up.
This is something I've been writing about for many years as the need has seemed obvious for many years. Although I don't think I have used this word before, the idea of working longer or monetizing a hobby or any other (hopefully) outside the box idea we've discussed, is adaptability. Part of the equation is the ability to adapt--something's gotta give.
Maybe you have enough to retire the way you want to at 65 but then two years later some sort of financial one-off comes along that costs 10% of your nest egg. And maybe this occurs after the market just went down 15% and the 10% cost is not versus your nest egg but instead versus your highwater mark from before the 15% decline.
So it is with this in mind, even if not specifically articulated, that I write so frequently about living below your means, finding alternative forms of income and avoiding a plan that must have Social Security to have a shot at working; all of these things make it easier to adapt to the unforeseen. There is no guarantee of adaptability only a better chance for it if needed.
The other article looked to build upon work done many years ago by Viktor Frankl by discerning between being happy in life and finding a purpose to your life. As you can imagine there are areas of overlap but there are some differences too, so says the article. One stat that stuck out was that four out of ten Americans "have not discovered a satisfying life purpose."
The article associated the word taker with being happy and giver with having purpose and steered its conclusion toward it being better to be a giver with purpose. While the article did acknowledge overlap between the two I think they overlap more than the article concluded or at least they can depending on a person's interests and outlook.
Zooming out some the quote from our friend Bill here in Walker is relevant; you can figure it out now or you can figure it out later but if you can figure it now you'll be much better off.
While I don't know how the four out of ten number cited above could have a large enough sample size, this is part of figuring it out. Of course financial-plan success can be had without adaptability and self-awareness but you won't know until you need it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





8 comments:
Retirement back in the day was a few years respite from forty-five years or so of physical labor. A few days ago, I suffered through a former university professor's complaining about his retirement situation. The fellow retired at age fifty five, with little or no financial acumen but a fat defined benefit pension, after twenty seven years of teaching a college load that entailed for most of his career nine hours per week of a thirty six week year actually in the classroom, not factoring sabattical leave, conferences, etc.
He was moaning about how his pension check will not cover the $30, 000 cost of a new roof on his $600, 000 home (in a plantation golf course community).
WTF.
T
Har, har, har T.
What about the deer in the headlight looks from those who are now receiving the cost of their health care benefits on their W-2s. The horrors of the prospects of taxing it.
It's not what you earn, it's what you keep. Maybe those rich fatcats aren't keeping so much after all.
Saving enough is clearly critical ...adjusting standard of living and identifying the place where those savings are optimally allocated is also critical. Here's some research that helps identify states appropriate to income level (some surprises in there).
Report: Who Pays? at http://www.itep.org/whopays/
...the report concludes that all states have regressive tax systems that ask more from low- and middle-income families than from the wealthiest. It also finds:
- The average overall effective state and local tax rates by income group nationwide are 11.1 percent for the bottom 20 percent, 9.4 percent for the middle 20 percent and 5.6 percent for the top 1 percent
- Ten states with the most regressive tax systems are: Washington, Florida, South Dakota, Texas, Illinois, Tennessee, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Alabama and Indiana.
- States praised as “low tax” are often high tax states for low and middle income families.
Until there is a means test for fuel, groceries and other items that are used by rich and poor alike, there will always appear to be an inordinate tax burden on the less affluent.
My electric utility tax to run central air and my 52 inch tv is the same as the welfare queen's down the pike. There is nothing unfair about this.
I am 58 and reture from the Italian pension system. The law has changed. I am enjoing the time.
Best,
Jeff from NYC
I had previously read both of those articles and Roger I always enjoy your perspective.
Viktor Frankl's book had a big impact on me in my early adult years. I thought the comments for the article were interesting in themselves.
On the adaptive side four years ago at 64 I took a 50% hit in net worth (divorce). The result a big downsize. Even so I still have a comfortable lifestyle on the north shore of Lake Tahoe with a three legged stool Social Security, small pensions and retirement savings. My original plan was built with Social Security as extra. Turns out it was great to have that buffer.
I really enjoy your comments on one-offs. Something not often factored into retirement plans.
love the North Shore, i dated a girl right after college whose parents had a condo in Incline Village, what a great place.
Roger, oddly enough I live in a condo in Incline Village... my favorite bumper sticker here - Tahoe Local, My Life is Your Vacation.
Post a Comment