Sunday, May 13, 2012
Sunday Morning Coffee
Just a brief comment or two about the upcoming Facebook (FB) IPO. According to Barron's, FB has a "user base of 901 million, or 58% of the globe's Internet users (not including China, where the site is restricted)." Barron's quoted company filings as follows "we do not currently directly generate any meaningful revenue from the
use of Facebook mobile products, and our ability to do so successfully
is unproven."
My first thought is it does not seem like there can be much user growth unless the restrictions in China come off. There was no mention of any expectation about growth in Africa, which has one billion people but would seem to be a ways from embracing social media. If this is correct then they need get growth from further monetization of the user base which might be difficult in the short term if more of the growth in usage is coming from mobile which is a weak spot for them.
It is not unreasonable to expect FB to overcome this weak spot but this appears to be what the thesis will rely on.
I haven't written much, if at all. about the FB IPO. Sometimes I get a sense of how these things will go (not to imply I am always correct) but I have no sense of how this one will go. It probably doesn't matter in that I've never tried to game an IPO with client money.
Zooming out a little, social media stocks are a fad. The fad may last for quite a while (or not) and some folks will do quite well but it could easily be that the thing (the utility gained from what these companies do) is far more important than the stocks as was the case in more instances than not 12 years ago. If you get involved, do so in a reasonable proportion so that a blow up does send you back to the financial planning drawing board.
My first thought is it does not seem like there can be much user growth unless the restrictions in China come off. There was no mention of any expectation about growth in Africa, which has one billion people but would seem to be a ways from embracing social media. If this is correct then they need get growth from further monetization of the user base which might be difficult in the short term if more of the growth in usage is coming from mobile which is a weak spot for them.
It is not unreasonable to expect FB to overcome this weak spot but this appears to be what the thesis will rely on.
I haven't written much, if at all. about the FB IPO. Sometimes I get a sense of how these things will go (not to imply I am always correct) but I have no sense of how this one will go. It probably doesn't matter in that I've never tried to game an IPO with client money.
Zooming out a little, social media stocks are a fad. The fad may last for quite a while (or not) and some folks will do quite well but it could easily be that the thing (the utility gained from what these companies do) is far more important than the stocks as was the case in more instances than not 12 years ago. If you get involved, do so in a reasonable proportion so that a blow up does send you back to the financial planning drawing board.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





5 comments:
The normal reason for an equity offer is avoid the cost of debt when free cash flow is insufficient to expand and strengthen a growing business.
That does not describe the situation at FB which has adequate current revenue to finance growth.
Which leaves the founders cashing out while the iron is hot as the primary explanation for the offering.
Nothing wrong with that and it's a frequent phenomena in fashionable or popular sectors but, even if the post-IPO FB stock price does not tank as expected, taking the under on the long-run prospects for the enterprise would remain a reasonable wager. JMO
Just think if all the time spent on social media sites was put to self improvement and the art of subtle, thorough conversation instead.Or, on other mentally challenging pursuits.
I can envision an epidemic of Alzheimer's due to brain atrophy at earlier ages.
T
Rodger, in April 2011 in a commentary you mention Michael O'Higgins in regards to Dogs of the Dow. I was interested if you know Mr. O'Higgins current thinking? I late 90's he was recommending treasuries and I believe he was 100% U.S. Treasuries. Pretty good call as it turned out.
Ron
I bet Roger is out on one of the wildfires
Strange but this was on the website of mutual fund observer this morning.
http://assetbuilder.com/blogs/andrew_hallam/archive/print/2012/05/14/moar-than-dogs-of-the-dow.aspx
Post a Comment