Wikinvest Wire

Monday, October 04, 2010

EFA Still Muddling

Yesterday I took a look at the Model ETF Portfolios on CNBC that Matt Hougan and Tom Lydon contributed to and noticed something interesting. Although I did not look at all of the portfolios the ones I did all seemed to be trouncing the iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund (EFA). First, good for them for outperforming that benchmark but I also think it contributes, as a microcosm if nothing else, to the idea that for foreign exposure the EAFE Index still stinks.

This is been an important topic here in terms of blog content and portfolio strategy. Per Google Finance, EFA is down 0.36% YTD compared to a 2.70% gain for the the S&P 500. If you look at the largest countries in the index you can see why. Japan (EWJ) is the largest component at 22% and for the year is up 0.87%, the UK (EWU) is second at 21% and is up 1.96%, France is third and is down 7.61% this year followed by a solid 5.21% lift for Australia (EWA) which is a client and personal holding.

It is very difficult for an investor to add value with an EAFE Index Fund assuming they are trying to capture foreign markets. In addition to most of the larger component countries not being attractive investment destinations the attributes of any country you might want to own can get blended away increasing the correlation to the SPX or a country in good shape might be too small to matter; the approximate 16% YTD lift in Finland hassn't done much for the broad index because it only makes up 1.6% of the EAFE.

Finland has very little debt, many pink sheet ADRs but is part of the euro currency. I've mentioned it before as being an interesting destination. The Scandinavian countries have done pretty well fundamentally through the crisis and so we have a fair bit of exposure there. There is the GlobalX Nordic ETF (GXF) which is heaviest in Sweden at the country level and banks at the sector level.

I've been harping on this same point for years for the simple reason that the fundamentals from these places (US, big Western Europe and Japan) are not very good. The analysis needed to decide what to avoid is not that complex; do you know you don't want to buy Greece? Anyone who can make that decision can also make the same decision about other countries too.

From there if you look for countries where the debt to GDP is maybe below 50%, the budget deficit is only a couple of percent (or even a surplus) and the government hasn't lied recently about other economic stats (like Hungary a couple of years ago); this sort of narrowing of the field should make the task easier in looking for countries to invest in.

I do think that in many instances it makes sense to use individual stocks as proxies for favored countries but to the extent not everyone is comfortable with individual foreign stocks there are obviously plenty of ETFs that can help do the job. In addition to all sorts of individual country funds there are sector funds, regional funds and themed funds that can get the job done--this too is obvious.

The reason to repeat this sort of thing so often is that I think the least compelling countries are going in the wrong direction while the healthy ones continue to do well. IMO it is crucial for people to understand this and change how they do things if they haven't done so already.

Yesterday may have been Jason Varitek's last game for the Red Sox. He has been part of a nucleus of players that has worked hard and achieved great things. In June 2008 my brother Larry and I went to a game at Fenway. A friend of a friend was on the team that year and we got to go into the clubhouse and dugout after the game (yeah we were thrilled beyond words) and one memory that made a huge impression was Varitek sitting in front of his locker wrapped almost like a mummy with ice everywhere answering questions from reporters. This was a picture of sacrifice on several levels.

On another baseball note I've made it about 45 minutes into part two of The Tenth Inning (sequel of sorts to Ken Burns' Baseball documentary) to see the segment about 9/11 and the 2001 World Series. Right after the Diamondbacks won there were several talking heads who immediately proclaimed it the best World Series ever and I remember thinking we need a little time to let it settle some and after reliving it in the documentary it really was an amazing series.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

The focus in Europe and the US is on redistributing income not on creating jobs or productivity

Anonymous said...

Let's see now. Countries like Finland having little debt, Norway having no debt, people living in these nordic lands being the happiest people on earth; one has to wonder whether socialst practices for the rich versus socialist practices for the masses shouldn't be the subject to be debated.

Anonymous said...

you want to see real growth look at india and china. once deeply socialist or communist a few decades ago. they have both embraced capitalism and grown by leaps and bounds

Stephen Drone said...

Two comments.

To me, the Japan part of EFA is a problem. I've spent considerable time trying to figure out how to get around that by using various index ETFs (in order to stick with my index strategy) but, really, the only way to do it is to get more "Roger-like", I think. I.e. take more of a bottom-up approach.

I looked at these portfolios last year and found them intersting, but not necessarily in a good way. So, these come out in 2009, the year after 2008. Wasn't the lesson of 2008, or at least one of the lessons, that we needed to understand the risk in our portfolio and be mindful of the fact that we could get clobbered? And yet every one of these portfolios has the bond portion of the portfolio at less than 40%, and/or puts a significant piece of the non-equity portion of the portfolio in things that got hammered in 2008. DBV and DBC, for instance.

I dunno, maybe I'm paranoid. but that type of thinking worries me, since they don't come out and say "oh, you should also practice market timing."

Roger Nusbaum said...

SD, if the second part of your comment is about the model portfolios, i believe they are intended to be actively managed. i did not see much in the way of trades done but I do think they are supposed to be managed-so while timing may not be the correct word, presumably something is being done.

WH said...

Avoiding Japanese equities might be an example of recency bias.

Roger Nusbaum said...

WH Japan has what i believe is the worst demographic problem on the planet and debt to gdp of close to 200%. Looking forward I'd rather stay away.

WH said...

While that may be true, it may have nothing to do with corporate profits.

Stephen Drone said...

I'm not sure what Japanese corporate projects are like. What I do see is that the Nikkei has literally gone downhill since I entered the workforce in 1990. Correlation be damned! Hah.

People keep saying "Whoa, Japan is on the way back" and it keeps not happening.

Stephen Drone said...

Roger - I see you point about active management of those portfolios - that makes a LOT more sense.

It's not really mentioned in the introductory article, and the commentary tabs don't seem to provide info in entry and exit points. Still, they make a lot more sense as active portfolios.

70zboy said...

Roger,

Great post and topic. There are plenty of ETF's out there to still gain their foreign exposure and avoid countires with little growth, debt and demographic issues. Some I believe to consider, in addition to your mentioned GXF and EWA would be EWD, EWL, and perhaps EWG for Europe and EPP, DGS, KROO, GMF, FRN, EPI and LATM for Far East and E. Mkts. Roger, a question if you have time - what website do you utilize to give you trailing PE's for ETF's? M-star, Yahoo, and the ETf sponsor always seem to be different and I have no idea what they are utilizing. Thanks

Roger Nusbaum said...

no great answer here, I would rely on the provider site over the portals but that is not said w/100% confidence

70zboy said...

Roger,

Thanks for responding

Proud Member Of