Wikinvest Wire

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

China

The US equity market started Monday by jumping 1% presumably because of news about new Chinese yuan flexibility. Who can say if that is really why the market started higher but clearly the news was buzzworthy as there are implications politically and for global capital markets.

Here is one recap from Mike Shedlock if you'd like to read a little more.

As I read a couple of things about this news I had a very big picture thought about the China story that I have touched on before. All of the problems (apparent and real) pertaining to over capacity, the housing market, the consequence of letting the yuan float, the consequence of of not letting it float and whatever else you want to add on is about properly (or not as the case may be) managing growth and modernization on the way up, so to speak.

The issues in the US, big Western Europe and Japan revolve around trying to prevent economic deterioration caused be excesses born of deep ceded problems that come with maturing, chronic deficit spending and unfavorable demographics.

My thought about China has been the same for a long time believing that China is clearly becoming more relevant in the world economic order but there will be plenty of mistakes made along the way.

It seems pretty clear that the Chinese financial stocks are most at risk should there be mistakes. There are issues with lending, speculation, over indebtedness on the part of municipalities and so on that make the sector very unattractive IMO. I also continue to believe that exporters are another bad way to go as they rely on consumption on the part of people in other countries with plenty of problems of their own.

Another segment I am wary of is recently IPO's Chinese companies traded in the US. I mentioned a company a few weeks ago called China Marine Food Group (CMFO). I noted it was small and probably difficult to follow, as are many of them, and then I made a comment about Barron's writing every so often about scandal with these and that often they are a product of a reverse merger. I made the comment not realizing that CMFO was itself a reverse merger. I thought that was funny.

I would avoid the broadest China ETFs as many are very heavy in financial stocks, obviously I would be more favorably disposed to a broad based China ETF that was light on financials. I think the China sector funds from GlobalX that focus on what the country needs for it's modernization would be worth considering; those being materials, energy or industrials.

For people inclined to pick individual stocks I would research companies that have been around for a long time. That doesn't have to be limited to large cap companies but I believe that the scandal factor is likely to be less at a well known company that has been around for a while.

In addition to the sectors above I think stocks from utilities and telecom play into owning part of the modernization theme.

For now we do not have across the board exposure for China but have owned China Mobile (CHL) in the past and before that Sinopec (SNP).

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Roger, Are you helping to fight the Flagstaff fires?

Roger Nusbaum said...

our department has not been dispatched. generally speaking our being a very small and relatively old department we don't get dispatched to fires out of the area. Further when dispatched it can be a 14 day haul which is very difficult for volunteers to commit to for work issues; I could never do something like that and be mostly unconnected like that for two weeks.

Anonymous said...

I use PGJ as my China ETF, which seems to have the lightest weighting in financials (6.6%). Do you think this ETF is still too broad? I like the sector mix better than GXC and FXI.

Roger Nusbaum said...

my own preference is to go narrow but not everyone wants to go narrow. for people who prefer broad I would suggest screening the choices and making your own decision about the best broad choice for you.

PGJ would be the best broad fund for anyone agreeing with my thoughts about the financial sector but obviously some see that issue differently.

Mike C said...

Just curious, do you put the SDS position back on Thursday if we get another close below the 200 DMA tomorrow?

Roger Nusbaum said...

I would take some sort of defensive action (buy an inverse fund, sell a stock or ETF) very late in the day on the second day. If it is too close to call then I might wait till the third day but ideally 15 minutes befoer the close on day 2

Anonymous said...

Roger, you often talk about Norway. If I find a stock of interest there but its only traded on the local exchange, how might one go about making a purchase?

Roger Nusbaum said...

i would tpye the name in at Pinksheets.com to see if there is a five letter designator for US trading. If there isn't then call your broker to see if they can buy it for you. Once an initial transaction has been executed NASDAQ will create a five letter designator.

Proud Member Of