Wikinvest Wire

Tuesday, May 04, 2010

New Mining Tax In Australia

There was loud news out of Australia, one of my favorite investment destinations, early Monday with a proposed new taxation of the mining companies to essentially spread the wealth coming from the mining boom. For now it is just a proposal, as it stands now it would phase in over many years (as far out as 2020) and there are a lot of moving parts.

The big macro is that it would change the taxation on bigger companies to paying a tax based on value as opposed to the current royalty which is based on volume. Sort of. For some reason the proposal has the companies still paying the royalty and getting it refunded back. One amusing little nugget (thankyouverymuch) from the immediate reaction is that Australian mining companies lost a combined AUD 9 billion in Monday trade which is the same amount that proponents of the plan expect to add in tax receipts.

More specifically this would be an excess profits tax (uh-oh) that would be applied after a normal rate of return on invested capital at a rate of 40% again after a normal return. One blogger I read said that he could not find what this meant but I heard on the Monday episode of Squawk Australia that this could be based on a ten year government bond yield but I cannot vouch for that as being accurate.

The plan offers a new benefit that is aimed at helping smaller mining companies. Essentially small, unprofitable mining companies would get tax incentives via tax rebates for exploration that have previously only been available to profitable companies.

I've read seven articles so far (all linked below) and the following quote is by far the best I found;

"It cannot discourage investment because RRT is really an excess profits tax. It only fires up when profits are over and above what would be required to invest in the first place. It cannot discourage investment."


This makes sense of course as companies and investors are typically not interested in excess profits. Wait, what did he say? A little humor is ok.

There are complaints and concerns popping up all over Australia as you can well imagine. Everyone is in agreement that that the country has benefited mightily from being so resource rich. People speaking out against the new scheme are worried about killing the golden goose. They say the tax will hurt the resources boom. One quote on this as follows "Macarthur Coal chairman Keith De Lacy said the planned new tax would lead to a decline in investment in Australia because other mineral-rich countries had lower taxes." Another article I read had quotes from the management at Royal Dutch Shell expressing concern over where their involvement in the Gorgon Gas Project (export LNG) goes from here.

This will not alter demand for resources but seems like it could negatively impact profitability--again they are looking to increase tax revenue by $9 billion. I suppose some of the concern over making certain projects not worth operating is valid but then that would reduce supply which with constant demand should lift prices making a project previously not worth operating because of the new tax worthwhile again.

One anecdotal story that hurts the argument against is that on Tuesday Newcrest Mining (NCMGY) increased its offer for Lihir Gold (LIHG).

There is a long way to go between here and this happening and of course it may not. A couple investment implication that occur to me would be to look at other Australian sectors (the financials are very accessible and relatively healthy), the new IndexIQ Australia Small Cap ETF (KROO) should benefit based on what proponents of the new tax have in mind for smaller miners and if anyone at iShares is paying attention they should get the New Zealand ETF that they filed for to the market this week. If the new tax plan becomes a big deal then I believe New Zealand stands to benefit by attracting investment demand that would normally go to Australia. Even if Australia is only marginally effected in this way, New Zealand is small enough that this could matter.

The links I have read so far are here, here, here, here, here, here and here. Nothing as of last night from John Hempton at Bronte Capital but you will want to read anything he says about it if you care about Australia as an investment destination. Big thanks to Wildebeests for most of the links.

Former major league baseball player Dave Roberts was diagnosed in March with Hodgkin's lymphoma but his prognosis is good. Roberts was only with the Red Sox for about ten minutes but the picture above captures the most important play in the team's history when he stole second base in the ninth inning of game four of the 2004 ALCS when the Red Sox trailed the Yankees three games to none. The Sox went on to complete the first 0-3 comeback in MLB history and their first World Series in 86 years. Roberts will always be worshiped in Boston for that play.

11 comments:

Stephen Drone said...

Has there been any backlash against the mining companies because of profits during 2008/2009?

I'm wondering what the background is here - why suddenly the wealth needs to be shared.

Roger Nusbaum said...

I am not aware of a backlash akin to the US and big oil during the election. One aim here is to beef up the superannuation fund which is the Aussie entitlement program which BTW is much much healthier than the US'.

John Hempton said...

Sorry - unlikely to comment. Ken Henry - whose review it was - is a former boss of mine - and I like him personally a great deal.

My comments have - given my past career - a little too much political tone.

J

Eric said...

I've read somewhere that the new tax still had to get through parliament, which wasn't a certainty. Don't know where I saw that, or how accurate it is.

To your point about New Zealand...wouldn't Canada be a beneficiary of a flight from Aussie resources too?

Stephen Drone said...

Roger did say it was just a proposal.

Anonymous said...

Roger, the market is off big today, reportedly due to worries about the PIIGS and the ramifications of default on their part. You have been forecasting one more big puke down for some time. Do you think this may be the start of it? If yes, how low do you think it may go?

Roger Nusbaum said...

Eric, Canada c/b a beneficiary but my thought on NZ is more about antipodean capital flows.

I don't know if this is the big one or not, more important would be to sort out what, if any action is called for as we go lower. I made just such a plan together this moringing mapping out a trade if we get close to 10% down

Eric said...

Gotcha, Roger. Understand that you weren't going to mention all possible beneficiaries to the tax. I only bring it up because Canadian companies seem easier to trade than NZ ones for those of us in North America, though that may be an erroneous perception on my part.

Interesting that VIX is up over 20% today, while gold is down slightly. I guess a flight to the dollar is holding gold down in USD terms. I, for one, am glad that people still flee to the USD when things get panicky. But I wonder how long that will continue.

Roger Nusbaum said...

Canada easier to trade? exactly why iShares should want to hustle on listing the NZ ETF and then market the hell out of it on the Aussie news
in my opinion.

RW said...

I caught myself humming the gospel tune, "Oh Sinner Man," while trading today (good vol, all around). The first verse asks, "where you going to run to" (repeats) "all on that day."

And the markets answered: US Debt.

Long-term, short term, $USD, didn't matter, fear kicked it up a notch and just about everything else including gold was abandoned.

Those busily discovering their inner deficit hawk or Hoover should put that in their pipe and smoke it: Might calm you down.

Anonymous said...

An article mentioned Newcrest and Lihir have most (80%?) of their operations outside Australia so aren't taxed on those. Remember the US is the only country that taxes it's citizens and corporations on worldwide income. This is why companies like Cisco have bond issues in the US when they have $10+ billion overseas because it's cheaper than the taxes to bring the money to the US.

Proud Member Of