There are several publicly traded toll roads in Asia, several European countries have one as does Australia (one that I know of in Australia anyway). From what I can tell China has more of these than any other country. If you go to Google Finance, which I am learning is far superior to Yahoo Finance in many ways once you get used to it, and type the word expressway in the quote box and then click get quote it will pull up a lengthy list of Chinese toll road stocks. There might be as many as 15 most of which seemed to be named for one of the provinces.
Many of the 15 are only traded in Shanghai so US based investors don't have access but it looks as though five of the 15 have US ticker symbols including the two largest companies in the space Jiangsu Expressway (JEXYY) and Zhejiang Expressway (ZHEXY) which market caps of HKD35 billion and HKD29 billion respectively. The other three that trade in the US are Sichuan Expressway (SEXHF), Anhui Expressway AUHEF) and Shenzhen Expressway (SHZNF). The first two are ADRs so they cover multiple ordinary shares per ADR versus the last three which are ordinary shares and so are very low priced because like many stocks traded in Asia the prices per share are very low.
In the time charted Sichuan Expressway looks to be the best performer but over shorter periods they have each taken a turn being the best performer and the laggard. The second chart compares one of the toll roads, Zhejiang Expressway, to Yinli Green Energy (YGE), Huaneng Power (HNP) and iShares FTSE/Xinhua 25 ETF (FXI). This might give a sense of how a larger toll road did versus a couple of other things from China or give some ideas about what to compare to for anyone interested in looking at these a little closer.
Some of the toll road stocks show up in some of the infrastructure ETF. The stocks seem to be a cross between industrials and utilities. They seem to track the broader market with varying amounts of volatility. I do believe that pound for pound there is less business risk here than with other segments of the Chinese market. They are obviously not banks lending money to people, they are not exporters (but they are beneficiaries as goods move from factories to shipping ports), they don't make commoditized items, they don't mine commodities and they don't build buildings or have to lease them out. Some traffic is sort of like staples; trips that have to be taken. Some traffic is discretionary as more and more people buy cars for the first time and want to hit the open road. It is common for the toll road operators to also operate gas stations, rest stops and other services along the road, even hotels.
I believe the business to be less volatile than businesses from other stock sectors but that does not always translate to the stock prices. Both ADRs are profitable companies, with PEs in the mid teens and a track record for healthy dividends. Additionally they have each been around for quite a while. Any stock could implode at any time but I think it is a good bet they are not out and out frauds which some people worry about.
When I first got interested in this space I bought a few shares of the Jiangsu ADRs in my IRA and still have the shares. I only considered the two ADRs. In the time I've owned Jiangsu it has generally been less volatile than Zhejiang which is not so great on the way up but much better on the way down. I also own it for one client with a very specific mandate where it fits in. Shortly after I bought it in my account I felt confident enough in it to want to add it for clients. I called into the Schwab Global desk and the person I spoke left me with the impression that it would be difficult to buy the number of ADRs I would need (keep in mind too we are a small firm) but Schwab charges a bloody fortune for trading overseas so for now no across the board position.
As a side note it is truly astounding to which Schwab was way in front of foreign trading and is now embarrassingly behind.





20 comments:
http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/
Posted by Izabella Kaminska on Jan 29 14:54
EXCELLENT graph from Forbes and comments by Gartman IMO
Would you mind giving a little detail on why you prefer google finance? Just better searches?
SD,
Google has fundamental data on foreign stocks and yahoo finance does not. additionally in looking for stocks to research yahoo finance abbreviates the names in such a way that you do not know for sure what stock you are looking at and since yahoo provides no data or new you never know. on google they have full names, news and data.
RR, you always uncover such interesting, eclectic stuff. Thanks!
if you buy into the idea that broad indexing won't get the job done or are sort of worried that might be the case then looking for other things because mandatory.
toll roads may or may not be the thing but looking outside the lines is has been and will continue to be important IMO
Roger. If I am reading the Google Finance chart correctly, it appears that JEXYY (pink sheets stock) trades 0 shares most days and not many on days that it does trade. Are you concerned about being in a position that you cannot quickly exit. Also, in general terms, what guidance could you provide about trading pink sheet stocks (ADRs vs foreign shares, volume, bid-ask spread, availability of information, the various categories they fall into [grey, current info, etc.]). Thanks.
it's not like my client or i have 10,000 shares.
the way i view things a portfolio with one or two things like this that are weighted modestly in a portfolio removes the reasonable likelihood of having to get out of this particular name in the manner U think you mean. there is no outcome with JEXYY that could be ruinous to the portfolio. if it was going to zero and I could not sell that would be frustrating and would be a difficult conversation with the client but at 2-3% of the portfolio it does not ruin the client or me for that matter.
i would note that ex-the worst financial crisis in 80 years not too many stocks are frauds that go to zero.
If toll road deals are modeled after the MIC deal for the Chicago Skyway, I would pass.
Seriously, I am curious as to the structutal libilities assumed when buying, leasing or building a "public" structure. On the other side of the coin, I suspect private companies may manage these entities better than politicians.
Another topic. I heard today that one way to finance our enlarged deficit would be to require individuals with private retirement accounts to have a percentage (or all) of these assets in government bonds to retain tax advantaged status. Othwise, retirement accounts would be taxed.The tactic would fund the deficit to the tune of about $2+ trillion in current retirement assets.
This was a public monologue and was not obtained from any official source - an opinionated blab. Still, this sounds plausible given the mountain of debt that has to be purchased to finance God knows what.
T
well T that certainly would be a tough choice!
Yes, indeed a tough choice!
I bet those retirement accounts would really benefit having niggardly interest rate government bonds tax free.....
Shaking in your boots??????
T
my initial reaction is to prefer to have my IRA taxable
Exactly.
If that idea was crafted into tax law, there is no way anticipated tax revenue from the scheme would be fully extorted. Tax avoidance would become the hottest financial game in town.
That stated, if China and other countries that buy loads of US debt no longer are willing to do so, the administration would find it very lucrative, within their political dogma, to go after retirement accounts as a taxable revenue source. Again, speculation.
T
I once read about a proposal for new government bonds to be issued that would only be available for retirement accounts. They would have a current rate of 5%,and the rate on new bonds would be indexed annually.
anon do you mean trills? the Shiller idea?
heck I'd LOVE to have more of my 401k in government bonds. Most 401ks don't have that choice; I can basically choose a "total bond market" fund.
The Skyway deal seemed OK. But then I only drive the road occasionally and not every day. Tolls did go up, but OTOH the quality of the road has definitely improved. Other outsourcing projects Chicago has done (see parking meters) have practically been a disaster.
Hi Roger, a Singapore Based investor here. I would like to refer you to a listed entity on the SGX called China Merchant Pacific that owns toll road operators and gives good yields. maybe you can tell me what you tink of it.
best regards.
never heard of it before. i am not finding it on google finance or yahoo finance.
if you have a code or trading symbol for it in singapore i can try to take a look.
On China Merchants Pacific try Sin ex with ticker C22
re China Merchants Holding (Pacific)symbol C22 in Singapore. It looks like it got involved with a whole bunch of other things that have since had to be liquidated.
the average dollar volume in Singapore is less than $50 per day.
it went down more than 0576.hk and came back less than 0177.hk.
while i certainly do not know the company as well as the person asking about it I would ask that given their interest in branching out into other things and other countries i wonder if one of the other might be a better hold
Google made the right choice by regulating offices in China.
Post a Comment