Thursday, September 18, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is a stock market blog about portfolio management,foreign stocks, exchange traded funds and the occasional musing about my firefighting experiences. The point here is to share process.
The opinions expressed on this site are those solely of Roger Nusbaum and do not necessarily represent those of Your Source Financial (“YSF”). This website is made available for educational and entertainment purposes only. Mr. Nusbaum is an Investment Adviser Representative of YSF, an investment adviser registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This website is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a complete description of the investment services or performance of YSF. Nothing on this website should be interpreted to state or imply that past results are an indication of future performance. A copy of YSF’s Part II of Form ADV is available upon request. In addition, a copy of YSF’s privacy notice can be obtained by click here. This website is in no way a solicitation or an offer to sell securities or investment advisory services. Mr. Nusbaum and YSF disclaim responsibility for updating information. In addition, Mr. Nusbaum and YSF disclaim responsibility for third-party content, including information accessed through hyperlinks. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
8 comments:
I agree. Charge the EKG paddles again.
England just banned short selling........if it happens here I wonder if it will affect the ultrashort ETF's??
ALso , the VIX broke 40 , historically marking some kind of low (see 2002, 1998)
any thoughts if this even matters?
i would expect banning short selling to have an unintended consequence, unfortunately i am not smart enough to figure that out ahead of time.
VIX above 40 could certainly matter. Down whatever we are this week, I would expect a feel good bounce to come at some point soon. if people want to say VIX at 40 was the reason, cool, that may be right.
Roger, some months back I asked you to comment on whether the advancements in communications that we have today via business channels, bloggers, etc. would materially change how the citizenry would respond to financial news of the kind we are having now. (talking heads, gasbags, self appointed experts, hysterical non-experts etc ) I probably didn't pose this question in so many words but I know you got my drift. These avenues didn't exist in previous bear markets. You indicated you would think about it. Any comments at this time?
although far from scientific i think anecdotes from the post earlier today go toward answering your questions but not fully.
when the choose to, people not involved on a daily basis have an easier time looking at numbers and headlines but there does not seem to be a lot of understanding. that is not to be critical it is vrey complex.
not sure i can draw a great conclusion from that; evolution yes, clear answer not for me.
More PIs buying and selling like headless chickens = more liquidity?
Roger everyone has an opinion on Cramer - what's yours? (remember this is a family blog)
Cramer? I think the financial channels are too much like a poorly trained Shetland sheepdog chasing the sheep in random directions. Lots of hystical action, but nothing worthwhile accomplished. I don't watch the TV channels. It's been said that Warren Buffet doesn't even pay attention to the daily news. I would rather follow his approach (although I'm not as successful, LOL.)
Post a Comment