I had several good questions come in on this week's video looking for a little clarification on some points. I'll try to accommodate here.The first question was from Ulli asking, essentially, why I believe in taking a gradual approach to defensive positioning.
Well, a few things. I don't really want to sell a lot of stocks that have not changed, IMO, fundamentally. This creates more commissions, tax issues (depending) and then uncertainty about when or how to get back in. As a matter of philosophy I don't care about one stock going down (assuming the fundamental story has not changed) I care about the entire portfolio.
If the market is up 5% in six months and your portfolio is up 4-6% in the same time period does it matter if one stock in that mix is down 12%?
From the no one can get them all right file, a portfolio is a mix of holdings that are going up and down. This also makes for better diversification. It seems to me that individual stocks go down for short periods all the time with no change in the business. This sort of normal movement is not something I try to trade around.
Steve.scoot asked about gold going down with stocks and whether cash is the only true hedge. First things first, I view gold as a way own something that has a chance of going up when the market suffers some sort of external shock like a terror event. I am far less confident that gold will zig to the stock market's zag when there is a market event that hits stocks. The thing in February and the thing this week were both market events.
I know the fundamental story about why gold should go up but my take is that the reality will not be as good as the story. If I am wrong, fine, I own gold across the board.
Put options, used correctly make good hedges but of course like all products they have some drawbacks. Inverse funds make good hedges but of course like all products they have some drawbacks.
Tomk doubts that market timing can improve returns, he says it is better for managing volatility. I don't think of what I am talking about as market timing. I am not saying it isn't market timing I am saying that is not my mindset.
The big idea is that when there is a problem with demand for equities, regardless of the reason, I want to reduce exposure. Problems with demand are what lead to down a lot, in a very simplistic way of thinking.
The picture is from Friday night. My brother Larry and I went to see the Red Sox play the Diamondbacks down in Phoenix. Larry went down to the stadium a couple of days before and got insanely good seats. There seemed to be more Sox fans than D-back fans. It was a great time. You can read a little more about it here if you are so inclined.





8 comments:
Is there aNY EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE THAT A BREAK THROUGH OF THE DOW JONES 200 DAY MOVING AVERAGE IS A RELIEaBlE TELL. aLSO SHOULD NOT VOLUME BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION AS WELL AS OTHER FACTORS ? Do you look for confirmation to other 200 day moving averages? thanks
Nice article, but I especially agree with you about taxes. I tried active trading but the taxes really got me. Thanks for the article.
Eric
http://emervest.blogspot.com
TAXES, I should be so lucky!
i don't study the Dow at all. Applying your question to the SPX, I don't know. I am not a technician. The 200 DMA in the manner I use it is simple and easy to be disciplined with.
I could make it infinitely more complicated but I don't know that I would be any more correct (or wrong).
Models this week:
Timing Model = 2.5
90% long, 10% cash
Global Allocation of Long Positions
MSCI EAFE Index 40%
MCCI Emerging Markets Index 30%
Russell 3000 Index - U.S. 30%
Top US Sectors
Composite Internet 4.5
U.S. Oil Equipment, Services & Distribution 4.0
U.S. Telecommunications 4.0
U.S. Oil & Gas 4.0
U.S. Mobile Telecommunications 2.5
U.S. Basic Materials 2.0
U.S. Leisure Goods 2.0
U.S. Biotechnology 2.0
Top Intl ETFs
MSCI Malaysia Index Fund 3
MSCI Germany Index Fund 3
S&P Latin America 40 Index Fund 3
MSCI Netherlands Index Fund 3
MSCI Singapore Index Fund 3
MSCI Brazil Index Fund 3
MSCI Mexico Index Fund 3
FTSE/Xinhua China 25 Index Fund 3
MSCI Australia Index Fund 3
MSCI South Korea Index Fund 3
MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index Fund 3
Not a lot has changed except EAFE stocks have been losing relative strength against US and Emerging stocks.
I don't see my timing model changing much unless we see the market start to break below it's 75 day moving average. A few of the sentiment models are racing towards OS territory so there could be an offset in the making.
I still have two double short positions and will continue to hold them until we hit new highs...or until the sentiment models hit OS levels.
What's the fundamental story for why gold should go up?
Thanks for a great Blog, do you ever comment on South Africa as a alternative investment vehicle?
http://bluvestments.blogspot.com/
Great blog but get ready for a 20% correction in the coming weeks.
Post a Comment