Wikinvest Wire

Sunday, September 03, 2006

Keeping It Simple

This post is more of a philosophical one than anything else.

I read the BusinessWeek cover story about toxic mortgages and was motivated to write this. Last week I wrote about whether or not there might be a lending bubble where residential real estate is concerned. Whether there is or is not a bubble will provide no solace to the people profiled in the b-week piece or anyone else facing mortgage problems. It is like the one-liner about it being a recession when your neighbor loses his job but when you lose your job it is a depression.

The people profiled in the article seemed like they all had 5% conventional mortgages and then went looking to lower their payments from there, which is where their trouble started. They had simple but then made it complicated.

Where your home is concerned; don't buy more than you can afford. Even better, how about less house than you can afford? My wife and I know a retired couple in their early 60's who are in good shape financially, but are not loaded. They recently moved into a nice home that cost more money than their old home. Their mortgage is about $4000 a month. They are not over-leveraged but I think life would be easier in retirement with a smaller nut to cover, or even better no nut.

Savings; Richard Bernstein was on the Connie Mack show on PBS and he said the US has a negative savings rate. He went on to acknowledge flaws in what that covers but he said it used to not be negative, now it is, something has changed.

Save money. Blah, blah, blah, this, that and the other. Just save money.

As for managing your portfolio; while this is far from an original thought I have written that investing can be a simple or as complex as you want to make it. While I believe what I do is simple it is a full time job for me. Most people don't want investing to take up 80% of their every waking hour. Below is one idea for very simple.

US Large Cap 25%: A dividend ETF
US Small Cap 15%: A product that captures small cap value
Foreign 25%: Any broad-based foreign fund or ETF
Commodity 10%: Any product that captures broad exposure
Fixed Income 25%: Any broad-based fixed income product

There is no shortcut for research and picking the best products for these categories. You can, and should, pick your own percentages and then rebalance once a fill in the time interval that makes sense to you.

This mix is riddled with flaws but it is simple and covers a lot of bases. This simple concept does not absolve you from paying some attention over time nor are you off the hook for making changes but there will be no day to day management of the portfolio.

While the above gives you simple it probably gives you no realistic chance of beating the market with any consistency. I do think it would let you be reasonably close and if you have saved enough (this is more important than what you pick) you have a very good chance of having enough money when you need it.

Credit cards; do I even need to say anything here?

Lastly, and I alluded to it above, live below your means. If things take a bad turn, like losing a job, a $3000 budget is easier to cover than a $10,000 budget. This is obviously tougher for some folks, especially younger people but this will afford flexibility with regard to career changes, lifestyle changes, financial shocks and anything else you can think of.

I mentioned that managing your portfolio can be a simple or complex as you want to make it, I think the same can be said for our financial lives. From where I sit, simple is always better.

10 comments:

T said...

Blah, blah, blah is right.I get tired of hearing the same refrain out of investment gurus from "Central Casting". I think David Dreman has it right in the 9/4/06 issue of Forbes,"The Unhappy Life of News Junkies". While not specifically nailing financial advisors, he does savage the folks who think that every event in the 24/7 drive-by media cycle creates mammoth investing challenges. Sometimes, I think CNBC and cable news as a whole do not benefit investors. I tend to view it as edutainment with rare instances of assistance to the long term investor.I advise novice investors to keep their hands off their computer keyboard and hold onto their wallet when tempted to impulse buy the stock market.In the real world of household finance, there is not room for much of "Cramerica". Their is room for common sense and a long term financial plan that, as you said, does not have to be rocket science.

Anonymous said...

Damm right. KISS is one princip(al) you can take to the bank. I may well use your categories. Picked up the book, The Great Mutual Fund Trap...surprisingly current, you could have written the book. Roger, are you giving me the cold shoulder about the short vs cash question?

Tom in Indy....thanks for your post on yield, bonds, etc.

Roger Nusbaum said...

T, good comment. The value to me of CNBC is the news that is reported. I have mentioned this before it save me time from having to read about certain that I should know about but don't impact the portfolio.

To Anon, I thought I answered you. I left a long comment on the original post. Please check it out, if I missed something pls re-post a little shorter.

Anonymous said...

Roger, you answer so reliably, we get spoiled...anyway....prior post is from saturday, big picture...near the bottom of comments where I re-stated the question. For your 4% of sds what would be needed in cash allocation for the same purpose, i.e. reduce impact of a down turn in mkkt? thx

Roger Nusbaum said...

Oy, this is not easy because there is a state of mind element as well as a numerical point.

I have not thought about this in the way it is asked. The numerical challenge is posed by the fact that if the market drops, the portfolio declines, but SDS gets larger. Assume, on an island, that a $100,000 has 4% in SDS, 8% is hedged. The market drops 10% the account would be worth $91,200($86,400 for the long portion and $4800 for SDS)-making assumptions I realize.

At this point SDS has grown to 5.2% of the account and hedges 10.4%. If the market drops further this effect is magnified.

In my example SDS absorbed $1200 of what would have been the decline so maybe this means $5200 would have to have been in cash for the same effect. But again the market is dynamic and so I don't think this can be nailed down.

JWC said...

Good post. That is why I like to read your blog.

My hubby and I had regular jobs, decent but not exceptional. He did have a good profit sharing plan in his, I had next to nothing retirement wise in mine.

We saved consistently and LIVED BELOW OUR MEANS. We retired when he was 55, with a net worth (excluding property) of a million dollars. Nothing fancy. Conservative index funds. We continued to live below our means and recently started collecting social security checks. We are now buying a nicer home (than what we have anyway) but it is still not expensive.

Keep saying it over and over. Save. Have some sort of investment plan, even if conservative. And LIVE BELOW your means. It works.

Anonymous said...

Roger, you are a gentleman and a scholar. "Oy"..That was about my feeling when I tried to answer my own question. The scenario you suggested is quite good, as it is one kind of correction to be protected against. While a short position helps to keep the portfoli intact bottom line for me is that to use a short for insurance, rather than cash, is that the feared correction may need to be on the order of 20percent. But, just a guess and I'm still learning.

FWIW. I just configured a hypothetical portfolio of 10 (passive index) etfs close to the allocations and weightings you present. Within the equity portion, total ytd return is 8.3%, not including yield, which as a group have an average yield of 1.8%. Sounds good to me. On a 2 yr chart, no etfs track closely. But if the mkt should really go down,I'm not sure about the impact of diversity.

QQQQ said...

Hi Roger,

I read in one of your previous posts that if you have the money, you should first pay off your house. I can afford to pay off my house right now, however, my situation is a little different.

I am a US citizen, retired in Europe with my investments in the US. I purchased a house here in Europe and the interest on my mortgage is 3.5% (variable). With the dollar being fairly low vs. the Euro and me counting on 8% annual returns from my stock and bond investments, I figure it makes sense not to pay off my mortgage. If European interest rates and/or the dollar go up I may rethink. The only advantage of paying off the house right now that I can see would be diversification.

Would love to have any feedback.

Love your blog. Very down to earth - practical.

PJ said...

Re short ETF vs. cash - I am presuming this is only an issue if you incur huge capital gains should you sell your long positions. If capital gains are not an issue why bother shorting against the box.

Let us presume you hold 100 shares of SPY that you wish to protect because you are nervous about the market. If you buy 200 SH to hedge your SPY long you basically have nil market exposure. However, you do have $26,000 tied up ($13,000 in the SPY long and $13,000 in the SH short). If instead, you sell your SPY long, you would be making 5% on $26,000 in your money market!

Ergo, if capital gains are not an issue, hedging makes no sense. Am I missing something?

Roger Nusbaum said...

QQQQ,

I think I said pay down the mortgage quickly not pay it off outright. mathematically paying it off only make sense if you think you will get less return in the capital market that you are paying in interest

to your specific situation I am not a planner and so I am not sure I can give advice on that. Any context I have ever disccussed this has been much simpler that your question.

PJ, if all you have is SPY it might be different but but that is not the portfolio I have so giving a direct answer is tough. also I have not totally neutralized my equity exposure, far from it.

Also if you have 40-50 holdings it is much easier to reduce net log exposure selling a couple of things and buying a short product of some as opposed to cleaning house.

Proud Member Of