Wikinvest Wire

Monday, September 25, 2006

Hmmm....I Wonder

My post the other day where I mentioned the Merger Fund (MERFX) got me to thinking about an idea. Not an idea without flaws mind you but an idea that if explored may provide some context for being a better manager of your own portfolio.

In that post I included this chart from Morningstar which shows MERFX in red compared to the S&P 500 in green over a ten year period. Ten years usually takes in a lot of cycles and a lot of stuff and is a reasonable benchmark of time.

If you knew you could get 80% of the market's return over that kind of time period with just a sliver of the volatility you might take that. Certainly there is a measurable chunk of the investment population that is not completely comfortable with the stock market's volatility.

I am wondering if there could be merit for a do-it-yourselfer to have most of their equity exposure in several things that behave in a similar manner to MERFX and then a little bit earmarked for a couple of more speculative ideas like maybe an Internet stock and an alternative energy name, just as examples.

If the market goes up a lot the idea would lag badly, when there is a bear market it would outperform by a mile.

There are a lot of ifs to the idea. While I have not yet looked for other things that behave similarly to MERFX, taking that fund a proxy for the idea there is no way to do any forward looking analysis on it. "Yeah I think that they will keep doing their thing the same way" is about all you can say or "I think the fund will be different two years from now." Neither one makes sense to me but that's about it for analysis.

One candidate for inclusion into this idea would be if something could actually mimic the CBOE Buy-Write Index. I plugged in just about every covered call CEF into PortfolioScience to try to find one that correlates highly to BXM and none of them do. Even the fund called S&P 500 Covered Call Fund (BEP) falls short with a correlation of only 0.459. With all the ETFs what about one that mimics one of the buy write indices? I believe in the concept and for now I think CEFs are the best way to capture it but I would not hesitate to swap for an ETF that could successfully mimic a buy write index.

This was the best chart I could find to compare BXM and SPX. It clearly is no MERFX but it is a noticeably smoother ride than the S&P 500.

With these two examples and any others that might come up I am not talking about fixed income products. The idea still centers around growth, boring sleep at night growth but growth nonetheless.

Clearly this will miss a lot of things and it does not strike me as the best possible way to manage your portfolio but if you do not already have an element or two if this, which I do, in your portfolio it probably makes sense to spend some time with this and learn a little more.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Boring, sleep at night, some growth even if not a lot of growth....I and probably others find this to be the sweet spot. The Hussman fund, mentioned here in the past, strikes me as an example. Roger, would you agree? There's still volatility and some risk as to the manager's judgement of where he places his short postions, but it would be an "element" to have in a portfolio?? Any chance you might identify a short list of etfs just arriving or soon to be arriving that could fit the bill of your slow steady growth portfolio? Personally, I'm not at the skill level of pairing shorts and longs, and would rather have a manager do this...but open to learning....if so, any reading material that you would recommend? Roger, I think you are onto a huge need out there if I am intepreting you correctly.

WITY said...

Greetings Roger,

I think the 46% correlation between the BEP and the BXM is a bit misleading. The nature of CEFs is that they are not liquid, and their premium/discount keeps changing in a manner that is pobably "noise" in the statistical sense. Given the fluctuations in BEPs discount/prem these past twelve months, I actually would call the 0.459 a high number.

Looking at their fact sheet (http://www.iqiafunds.com/cgi-bin/upload.dll/file.pdf?46e710e53f5442849e95081abc1cd387) it seems over the longer periods (quarters, YTD, 12mo) they just about did what the index did, minus the fees and expenses.

Having said that, those fees and expenses are a bit on the high side. And the noise is not helpful. For these two reasons I agree with you that an ETF would trump the BEP for everyone but the discount shoppers.

Anonymous said...

Here is a list of low standard deviation funds(check out Google finance which has 1 yr SD numbers!)
Name 1 yr% 1 yr SD Alpha/Beta
MERFX 8.5 4.4 0.5/0.3
HSGFX 2.2 3 -1.7/0.1
PVFIX 7.2 3 5.3/0.1
SWHEX 8.3 3.3 4.6/0.1
ALPHX 6.4 5.3 1.3/0.6
TFSMX 15 5.6 10/0.5
SPY 11 7.3 -0.1/1

It is obvious some managers are more skillful than the others. Consistency in performance is the real problem.

Roger Nusbaum said...

I like the idea of exploring this further. The comment at 8:37 does most of the work for me, hehe.

The Hussman fund, you isolated the potential issue. I read him first thing every monday morning so I respect him, period, but I think anyone making active decisions, him, me, anyone else, will get some wrong.

I wouldn't the the fallout from his being wrong will be that bad but it is a variable.

Of course this variable may exist witht a lot of choice that could fit into this category; both the maybes and the absolutely belongs.

Anonymous said...

Interesting exercise Roger. I built a portfolio of MERFX, HSGFX, PVFIX, SWHEX & ALPHX (left out TFSMX due to lack of 3 yr track record). For the trailing 3 years (ending 8/31), the combined porfolio outperformed 3 of the five funds and had a lower s/d than 4 of the 5. Here's how it stacked up to the SP500:

name:3yr mean,3yr s/d,alpha,beta
Port: 9.96, 3.91, 3.59, 0.41
SP500: 10.95, 7.75, 0, 1

So, the combined portfolio would have given you 91% of the return of the index with half the risk. Wish we had more than 3 yrs to go on...

Roger Nusbaum said...

thank you for the work. This study looks like it is going to more and more interesting.

they just posted in on Seeking Alpha so it might find its way to Yahoo Finance. Maybe we can get some other folks to weigh in and then I can explore further from there.

Anonymous said...

Roger,

I am aware of the covered-call-writing CEF, actually the 1.5 x leverage buy-write-index fund BEO has been doing well lately (I believe it's run by the same folks that run the 1.0 BEP). I can not invest in OEFs unfortunately and just wanted to check if I considered all possibilities for my portfolio.

Any other CEFs could you think of that mimic one of these market neutral strategies? Do any long/short CEFs exist???

Thanks!

Proud Member Of