Friday, March 31, 2006
Quarter End
The wrapping up of the quarter allows me to provide a little evidence to a point I have been making since the start of the blog, which is that predictions about the market are useless. The S&P 500 finished the quarter up 3.73%. If you add in the quarterly dividend the total return would be about 4.13% (ETFconnect has the yield of IVV as being 1.59%).
I have been saying all year that I think the S&P will finish the year between 1180 and 1219, down a little. I have not changed my opinion nor am I likely to. The prediction will either be right or wrong but for now it is looking very wrong.
Despite being wrong my generic portfolio that I maintain on Yahoo Finance was up 5.28% including dividends, but excluding interest earned on cash. It probably makes sense to subtract 0.30% as a management fee (this is my guess of the average fee charged to clients), keep in mind that any one client may have done better or worse.
This is not fantastic but it makes a couple of points. I wrote all along that the market showed no signs of cracking and that I was not going to try to outguess a big move in the market that may never come. If you can think of the quarter as being successful it was because I stuck to the same things that I always stick to which is being diversified, not making a lot of trades and relying on big picture themes to make overweights and underweights.
I thought that telecom might be in for a good year and it was the best performing sector as measured by iShares sector ETFs with a gain of 13% (I am eyeballing a chart for all of the coming numbers). The second best performing sector appears to be the industrials with a gain of just over 8%. It is possible that most of the 1.15 basis points I added came from this sector. One name was up 25%, another was up 14% and one other, Armor Holdings (AH) was up 35%. I sold AH this morning very close to the open at $58.61. It has been in this area for a while and I am concerned about it heading back down, the stock is kind of a hot potato.
The industrial sector was not really on my radar at all yet proper diversification (or at least my perception of it) worked once again. It is a good bet that it will always work. One thing I have written before is that in a portfolio, one stock will be the best performer, this quarter it was AH (unless I am forgetting something). Three months ago I would not have thought AH would have the best quarter out of what I own. It had not moved much in months. The point is that by being diversified my clients had less riding on my being right.
With time and discipline (which each have their own obstacles) this is easily replicated. This will not appeal to people that like to chase heat and trade but for people less interested in high turnover I think the concepts are sound.
One last point to really hit on is that no one can beat the market all the time (Bill Miller, an exception that proves the rule). All I am trying to do is stay close most of the time. If you have saved (or still saving) enough money this is all you have to do.
I have been saying all year that I think the S&P will finish the year between 1180 and 1219, down a little. I have not changed my opinion nor am I likely to. The prediction will either be right or wrong but for now it is looking very wrong.
Despite being wrong my generic portfolio that I maintain on Yahoo Finance was up 5.28% including dividends, but excluding interest earned on cash. It probably makes sense to subtract 0.30% as a management fee (this is my guess of the average fee charged to clients), keep in mind that any one client may have done better or worse.
This is not fantastic but it makes a couple of points. I wrote all along that the market showed no signs of cracking and that I was not going to try to outguess a big move in the market that may never come. If you can think of the quarter as being successful it was because I stuck to the same things that I always stick to which is being diversified, not making a lot of trades and relying on big picture themes to make overweights and underweights.
I thought that telecom might be in for a good year and it was the best performing sector as measured by iShares sector ETFs with a gain of 13% (I am eyeballing a chart for all of the coming numbers). The second best performing sector appears to be the industrials with a gain of just over 8%. It is possible that most of the 1.15 basis points I added came from this sector. One name was up 25%, another was up 14% and one other, Armor Holdings (AH) was up 35%. I sold AH this morning very close to the open at $58.61. It has been in this area for a while and I am concerned about it heading back down, the stock is kind of a hot potato.
The industrial sector was not really on my radar at all yet proper diversification (or at least my perception of it) worked once again. It is a good bet that it will always work. One thing I have written before is that in a portfolio, one stock will be the best performer, this quarter it was AH (unless I am forgetting something). Three months ago I would not have thought AH would have the best quarter out of what I own. It had not moved much in months. The point is that by being diversified my clients had less riding on my being right.
With time and discipline (which each have their own obstacles) this is easily replicated. This will not appeal to people that like to chase heat and trade but for people less interested in high turnover I think the concepts are sound.
One last point to really hit on is that no one can beat the market all the time (Bill Miller, an exception that proves the rule). All I am trying to do is stay close most of the time. If you have saved (or still saving) enough money this is all you have to do.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





4 comments:
Mentioning your generic portfolio. Made me think about bonds and fixed income. I do not remember or maybe I did not see any comments on that subject. Maybe abit of elabration would help.
Did you publish your generic portfolio in a previous blog? My quartery return from 50/50 VBINX(balanced)/VINEX(international)came out 8.5%. BTW, this simple portfolio beats all my bigger portfolios, which have more bonds and cash positions.
i have not published it also it is just the equity portion of what I manange for clients.
As for the 50/50 foreign/domestic, it is probably very heavy in Western Europe which had a great quarter.
Roger,
You are right. VINEX has 65% in UK/Western Europe. A portfolio of 50/50 VBINX and VINEX is 10% less volatile than SP 500 and has been quite impressive for the past 5 years:
50/50 portfolio. 8.5%YTD,23%1yr,29%3yr,26% 5 yr. In contrast, for S&P 500. 3.8%YTD, 12% 1yr,17.3% 3yr,3.8% 5yr. Of course, these were historical results. Future results may be much lower than these but I suspect the advantage fo this 50/50 portfolio over S&P 500 may still persist:)
Post a Comment