Thursday, June 02, 2005
What Should The Fed Do?
I first wrote last fall when the tightening cycle began that I thought they would stop between 2.75% and 3.50. Shortly there after I tightened up and wrote that I thought they should stop at 3.00%-3.25%. For a while it looked like I'd be wrong by a lot and then things changed a little and yesterday things may have changed a lot.
Stopping at 3.25% is now not impossible, unlikely but not impossible. 3.50% has a good chance of being the stopping point. Tuesday night on CNBC Asia I said I'd like to see them stop at 3.5% and that if the ten year can stop at 3.80% or 3.90% we'd be in decent shape.
The Fed's mandate pertains to inflation. So is there inflation? Does it need to be aggressively contained? To me this is the conundrum. Core PPI and CPI are not capturing where inflation is the highest. We are paying more at the pump (yes I realize by definition core excludes energy) and more for health care, a lot more.
Since these increases have not spilled over into the other parts of the economy (yet?) and all of the data points directly dealing with economic growth have been underwhelming I would like to see them stop now. It takes six months or so for rate increases to make their way into the economy. Stopping or pausing now allows the last couple of hikes to have their impact on an economy that shows signs of slowing.
Stopping at 3.25% is now not impossible, unlikely but not impossible. 3.50% has a good chance of being the stopping point. Tuesday night on CNBC Asia I said I'd like to see them stop at 3.5% and that if the ten year can stop at 3.80% or 3.90% we'd be in decent shape.
The Fed's mandate pertains to inflation. So is there inflation? Does it need to be aggressively contained? To me this is the conundrum. Core PPI and CPI are not capturing where inflation is the highest. We are paying more at the pump (yes I realize by definition core excludes energy) and more for health care, a lot more.
Since these increases have not spilled over into the other parts of the economy (yet?) and all of the data points directly dealing with economic growth have been underwhelming I would like to see them stop now. It takes six months or so for rate increases to make their way into the economy. Stopping or pausing now allows the last couple of hikes to have their impact on an economy that shows signs of slowing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)





1 comments:
Greenspan has caused the last two recessions because of his view of the job. He thinks he is there to micro-manage the economy, and he's doing it. He felt the stock market was too high (irrational exhuberance) so he acted to pierce the bubble. Now he's after home building and real estate, in this case he feels money used to buy homes could be used for better purposes.
All these East Coast Ph.Ds have one thing in common: they believe that people without advanced degrees should be on the unemployment line. Trust me, if his policies resulted in our elites losing their jobs he'd be out on his ass.
Post a Comment